Labor Reinstating Technology
During a time of continuously growing technology, there is always a constant curiosity about where our futures are headed. As technology advances, more and more services provided for us are done by machines that have taken over jobs done by humans. This is why technology can be seen as detrimental to the contemporary workforce. If routine tasks can be completed flawlessly by computer algorithms rather than paying a human to do it, a lot of businesses are going to take advantage of this.
So what does this mean for the future of these jobs? In an article written by Marcus Casey and Sarah Nzau , “Robots kill jobs. But they create jobs, too”, the authors shed light on the future of automation it’s influence on the workforce. Casey and Nzau explain the differences between technology that replaces jobs, and labor reinstating technology.
It is important that we take into consideration the significance of labor reinstating technology. As the digital age continues to grow, more jobs will be lost to technology. Casey and Nzau present the significance of public policy encouraging the development of technology that will lead to more jobs and higher wages.
These are some of the ways we can enforce the development of labor reinstating technology directly from the article:
Technology will continue to replace jobs, but they will also create jobs in unpredictable ways as technology advances. A lot of people believe that there is a fear of technology continuing to replace more jobs, leaving less and less jobs available for future generations. This seems to be an unrealistic fear, given the amount of new jobs that have been created from AI.
I agree that a lot of people seem to fear the robot portion of advancing technology because it may take away jobs. You did a great job researching how it will actually make jobs. Under the field of technology, there will be tons of options for employment. We need engineers to design and build the robots, managers to produce multiple robots, people to perform maintenance exams on them to make sure they don't realize their true potential and revolt against us, etc. Then of course we'll need body guards for all of the software engineers incase one day the robot revolution actually happens.
ReplyDeleteAs a journalist, I do not fear advancing technology. I know that print media is a dying field, and most news consumers get their information from apps or online news outlets. I honestly like The Clock's website better than the actual print. When the print comes out, and I notice errors, there's literally nothing I can do. We, meaning the staff and I, can, however, fix mistakes on the online articles and re-upload them. It's a quick fix. If in the future, I am working at a strictly-online newspaper, I'd be happy. Not that I dislike printed papers, I do have a not-quite-yet-nostalgic love for them, but online news outlets seems so much more practical not only in terms of last minute editing, but adding new information as it comes along in real time.